Archive for ‘Reactivity’

July 3, 2009

(Mis)beliefs about love…

by Rod Smith

You can love and NOT worry...

You can love and NOT worry...

Easy-to-make fundamental (primordial) errors of belief humans often make in relationships can unsettle (challenge) the strongest of commitments. These “emotional fault-lines” can require intensive understanding on behalf of the one so inflicted, and, when not embraced and accepted by others (I do not mean appeased) these troubled foundations can result in consequential ramifications in day-to-day loving, living, and parenting:

1. Attention equals love and the amount of attention reflects the amount of love. To mistake attention with love and the lack of attention with the lack of love. “If you love me then I will be the focus of much (hopefully all) of your attention,” and,”If you give your attention to someone else it means you love them and not me or you love them more than you love me.”
2. Worry (anxiety) equals love. To think (or feel) that the presence of anxiety or worry or concern is a sign of love and commitment. “If I love you then I must worry about you,” or “If you love me then how can you be so seemingly worry-free about me?” or “When you love someone you think about that person and worry about what they are doing all day, or you don’t love them.”
3. Togetherness, unity, and being “on the same page” are signs of love and commitment. “How can we possibly love each other if we don’t think and feel and see things in as much the same way as possible? There, look at Jack and Jill across the street, they are so in love she even thinks for him, they dress the same, and he calls her 15 times a day at work to let her know he’s concerned about her safety. Now that – that is love.”

June 16, 2009

Take up your life….? (Becoming more personally responsible for your own life)

by Rod Smith

You frequently write: “steel yourself” and “hold onto yourself” and “take up your life.” What do you mean?

Take up your life

Take up your life

Your problems cannot be “solved” or “fixed” by reading this or any column. In fact, they will not be “fixed” even if you read this column, watch Dr. Phil daily and visit a therapist on a weekly basis. These would be, at best, helpful catalysts. At worst, you’d be wasting a lot of time and using yet another means to avoid facing your issues.

The “answer” to your life’s issues (if there is one – you might have to go with an approximation), no matter how large they may appear to you, or how trivial they may appear to others, always rests first with you. Healing begins when you gather up your metal, brace yourself for change, and decide to “take a hold of yourself” and address head-on the problems and complexities you face. “Steeling yourself” is gathering your strength (even if it is minimal) to do what you must do to begin your own process of recovery, healing, or untangling from unhelpful entanglements.*

Even if you have been a victim, grew up in severely adverse circumstances, and both your parents were alcoholics while you were destitute and hungry, your healing and maturity pivots, not on more sympathy, more empathy, or more understanding. it is not “out there” in some book you are yet to read, or on some website you are yet to discover, some guru you are yet to run into, or on some lover you are looking to meet. It is ALWAYS dependent on your acknowledgment of your role in how your life has unfolded (your response to whatever has happened, is currently happening, and will happen to you) and will continue to unfold. It is dependent on you shedding yourself of ALL “victim thinking” and of ALL blame. It is ALWAYS dependent on you taking personal responsibility for your decisions as much as you are able at THIS time (now, today!). This is what I mean by “take up your life.”

I am very aware of this being an unpopular message in an age and a time when “quick-fixes” are offered at every click of the mouse, pointing of the remote, and book shelves abound with every Tom, Dick, and Sally’s offer to deliver you into a perfectly fulfilling life. Sorry, it just doesn’t work like that. Until you become your own “Knight in shining armor” you might always remain a “damsel in distress,” albeit an insightful one!

* For me, a helpful metaphor is to imagine a diver on the edge of a high diving board. He or she STEELS him or herself before taking the leap.

June 8, 2009

Could he kill you?

by Rod Smith

Dangerous relationships are easier to endure than address, so it is not surprising that the murder of a wife, an ex-wife or lover usually takes everyone by surprise. Secrecy, cover-up, denial are the hallmarks of toxic binds.

I think women could use a set of criteria to evaluate whether they are involved with a man capable of committing a violent crime against them. Accurate or not, the list could help a woman escape a potentially abusive relationship, or at least eradicate the virus before it destroys her.

Men who are capable of killing a “loved” one often leave trails of early indicators, like rose petals around an open grave, before they commit a horrible crime.

Perhaps someone’s life will be saved because this list, incomplete as it is, will assist someone toward getting appropriate help:

1. He tells you how to dress and insists you obey his wishes in this regard. If you resist he becomes irrationally hurt or angry. You are beyond choosing what you wear because your dress is his domain. [Please realize that not all controlling men are potential killers.]

2. He checks up on you for “your own good.” He wants to know where you are, what you are doing and whom you are with. Time unaccounted becomes an accusation. You find yourself explaining or hiding everything, to avoid the laborious conflicts that inevitably ensue.

3. Any move toward independence on your part is rewritten as betrayal.

4. He tells you when you are happy, and rewrites what you feel if you are unhappy. He tries to keep you from your family, suggesting they are not good for you.

5. He tells you when you are hungry and what you like to eat. He says he knows you better than you know yourself. He gets upset if you insist you are not hungry when he says you are – so you relent and feign hunger!

6. He is jealous of your friendships, even those that predate him and those that are over.

7. Keeping peace is second nature to you. Ironically, the peace seldom lasts because he jumps on the smallest issues, magnifying them into major breaches of trust.

8. His highs are very high and his lows very low. It seems as if your response to him is inordinately powerful in changing or determining his mood.

10. He demands his own way and has an inordinate perception of his own importance. He shows off his “power” by threatening to “talk to the manager,” when he is not given the service he thinks he deserves. He becomes irrationally angry at the smallest of inconveniences. He accuses you of “taking sides” if you suggest he is being unreasonable.

11. He lives on the edge of “white hot” anger, becoming very angry with children, animals, and anyone or anything that doesn’t obey him. He hides this anger from people outside the “inner circle” and his mood quickly changes if an “outsider” appears so that his anger is kept secret.

12. He removes your car keys or your purse to restrict your movements and then denies doing so.

13. In the early days of the relationship you felt like you were on a fast ride on an unpredictable roller coaster. Everything was too much, too soon, but you did not know how to say it. Any comment about wanting to “slow down” on your part was ignored. You felt invisible, as if you were just along for his ride.

For such men, winning is everything — losing control is not an option, even for those whom they proclaim to love the most.

Four of MANY responses after this column first went to press. Excuse the language. I kept it “as is” for it illustrates an important point:

“HOPEFULLY, YOU ARE FREELANCE. OTHERWISE A DOLT, SUCH AS YOURSELF, SHOULD BE SHITCANNED. STUPIDITY IS THE HALLMARK OF A BRAIN STEM. YOUR RESPONSE WILL BE WELCOME, HOWEVER, INSIGNIFICANT. RE: YOUR BULLSHIT ARTICLE “TOXIC”.

“You saved mine and my children’s lives this Saturday. Thanks.”

“May flowers be placed at your front door this morning for writing about domestic abuse.”

“I am referring to your article published in the Indianapolis Star, Saturday, April 17, 2004. I am the mother of a 33-year-old daughter who was stabbed repeatedly by her controlling, abusive husband. We had returned from Florida the week before your article appeared after attending the sentencing hearing for his life imprisonment without parole. Your article brought such impact to us. I wish that we’d had all those pieces 3 or 4 years ago. Reading all the points of your article has brought image and explanation to many things that we already knew or suspected, but were unable to do anything about. For over 2 years prior to her death, our family had no contact with her. I thank you so much for writing such an article. I am hoping that it will bring some closure to our sons who are still coping with the past and losing their sister.”

 

June 3, 2009

Handling emotional affairs

by Rod Smith

Let's talk

Let's talk

An emotional affair (a non-sexual inordinate attachment with someone other than the spouse) will be very tough on a committed spouse. If this affair is full-blown you will probably feel as if you are living with someone who is absent in every manner but physically. He or she would really rather be elsewhere.

Calling attention to this hurtful inordinate attachment will probably result in flaring tempers and/or in further distancing which are designed to silence you. Consequently you will find yourself watching every word you say lest every encounter results in a flare up and/or in your spouse walking out the door.

Suggestions:

1. “Steel” yourself. Remind yourself that you are strong, deserving of the very best in all your relationships, that you are unwilling to tolerate “sharing” your spouse. This is a reasonable position to hold.
2. Do not keep it a secret. Draw attention to the emotional affair even if it disrupts the peace in your home.
3. Be prepared to take radical stands. Be willing to ask your spouse to move out and do not cooperate with the affair any more than you would were it fully sexual in nature. That the affair is non-sexual does not make it acceptable.

May 22, 2009

Her ex is selfish

by Rod Smith

“I am getting married in a few months for the second time. I have two sons (8 and 10) and she has a daughter. My children do not live with us but she has her daughter who pays irregular visits to the child’s father. I want her ex to be more consistent or to not be in the picture at all. We sit around waiting for him to decide what he wants to do before we can make any plans. My fiancé cannot seem to see how selfish this is. Please help.”

You will face much bigger hurdles....

You will face much bigger hurdles....

The child’s father is not “in the picture” for you and nor should he be “out” of the picture simply to make your life easier. Get used to the idea that your soon-to-be wife’s ex-husband is an integral part of his daughter’s life. Until a court of law decides the man is unfit to fill his role as the child’s father I’d suggest you do all you can to make the child’s relationship with her father as uncomplicated as possible.

Yes. Of course you and your fiancé, together, ought to have a conversation with him about how he may assist in making all of your lives less complicated. Be assured your upcoming marriage will confront you with far more complex situations than this one.

May 17, 2009

Reactive? Responsive? One usually hurts, one usually helps heal…

by Rod Smith

Get out of the middle!

Get out of the middle!

Reactivity in relationships (short-fuse living, attacking, failing to listening, assuming you know what others are saying anyway, harboring damages, gossiping, transmitting unhelpful or damaging information, being sarcastic) usually hurts others and our relationships.

Responsiveness, on the other hand (embracing and listening to what others are saying before responding or acting, allowing the full story to be told without making judgments, holding onto ourselves in the face of trouble or anxiety and the anxieties of others, not falling when all the other dominoes are falling) usually helps heal others and our relationships.

Yet it is important to realize that responsive people or those persons whose behavior is usually characterized by being responsive, did not get there by sheer willfulness or determination. Becoming a “non-anxious presence” is the result of the long, and often very slow work of making peace with every possible relationship and human connection (past and present) a person has. Reactivity (anxiety) and Responsiveness (non-anxiety) are not willful choices but rather the product of individual journeys.

Finally, reactive behavior and responsive behavior are not “bad” and “good” respectively. A person can be display both. A parent can be viciously reactive if a child is threatened (appropriate) and yet warm, nurturing, and protective toward the same child all in an instant.

April 23, 2009

Who dictates how mother will be treated?

by Rod Smith

This is a longer post than usual. This is a good example of TRIANGLES. Please read the WHOLE post.

“Three years ago my mother and my husband got into a horrendous fight at a family get together. I was not in the room at the time. If I could have only known that my mother was planning on attacking him over something petty I would have stopped her in her tracks knowing that my husband is the sort that is unforgiving and once you cross him, you are on his list forever. With this being said, from that day forward my husband has refused to let my mother step foot in our house. He wants nothing to do with her. He will allow for my son and me to visit her any time we would like. But since then my mother has tried to apologize and make mends because it breaks her heart and mine as well that she cannot stop in and see me whenever she would like. I tried once to put my foot down and say that I would not allow him to dictate such a decision, but it almost resulted in the end of our marriage. I had never thought it would go that far, so I of course backed down because I would prefer to keep my marriage intact. I try to visit her at least once a week, but it is not enough in her eyes and I am right in the middle of horrible predicament. I want my mom to visit me whenever she wants but I also cannot force my husband to let her come over. How do I handle this situation please? I am torn and it hurts terribly. I hope to hear from you soon.”

Send your thoughts. Be a support to someone you will probably never meet.

Send your thoughts. Be a support to someone you will probably never meet.

Here are some thoughts. I hope you will find them helpful:

You are in a two-choice dilemma (both options seem bad, this is a David Schnarch term), a double bind (both choices involve undesired cost), between a rock and a hard-place (angering your husband, losing your marriage, missing your mother), the classic triangle (being monkey in the middle). I am fully aware that my naming the issue doesn’t help you one little bit. But, YOU are carrying the anxiety for an issue NOT your own, and thus you endure the stressful feelings of being “torn.” You feel torn because you are. You were not in “the room” at the time of the “horrendous fight” but you have been living in that self-same room ever since. He’s left the room three years ago taking all the power with him and left you and your mother staring powerlessly at each other too scared to do anything in case he decides to put you out in the same manner he put your mother out.

So, I’d suggest you begin (slowly) to take back the power both persons (yes, your mother took it too) have stolen from you. While this may temporarily escalate your anxiety and the conflict, it will ultimately (perhaps only in a few years since these matters take time – remember it has taken you three years to write to me!) reduce your stress and give all of you a chance to grow. Let me also say that if the marriage ends it will not be because of this issue regarding your mother. No mother is that powerful. If the marriage ends it will be because your husband and you refuse to grow up. I do not mean that as an insult. Every single one of us faces the daily task of allowing life to grow us up. Your husband has assumed ALL the power in the sense that he has decided, and continues to decide, the shape of your relationship with your mother. If this is acceptable to you, go on walking on the eggshells he has randomly laid out for you to walk on. Your husband only has the legitimate power to decide about his relationship with your mother. He is empowered to make decisions about the shape of the relationship you have with your mother IF you give it to him or if he takes it and you do not speak up and resist it. On the note of power and your husband: I will make the assumption that you are powerless (by his choice) in other areas of your life and marriage. It is unusual for controlling men and women to want to control only one area of their lives.

I’d suggest you:

1. Steel yourself. This means gather your internal resources, count the costs, make a decision, create a private plan. Find the endurance necessary for the growth and challenge inherent in this situation. Remember this has been going on for years and so your husband is used to your compliance no matter how much fuss you made over this in the past.

2. Invite your mother to dinner at your home. Let your husband know that he is invited to attend or to choose to eat elsewhere when his mother-in-law visits. I’d suggest you do this at least once every two weeks. This will help you get out of “the room.” Don’t surprise him with her visits. Just tell him you are not willing for him to decide the shape of your relationship with your mother, but that you will not attempt to interfere with the shape of the relationship he has (or doesn’t have) with his mother-in-law. This is why the choice is his to be at the meal, to be at home and in another part of the house, or to leave the premises completely. He gets to decide for himself how much power his mother-in-law’s visits possess – by how far or near or engaged or disengaged he chooses to be during her periodic visits.

3. Suggest that your mother agree to announce when she’d like to visit at least a week ahead so that you and your husband may decide if her suggested time is convenient – this is “normal” procedure for guests in western cultures, even, sometimes, for family. If he is uncooperative (which means he always says no) then invite your mother anyway. Then let him know when she will be there and then he can get to decide if he will share space with her, create a scene, decide to evict you, or decide to make other plans. Again, he gets to decide how powerful his mother-in-law will continue to be in his life by the manner in which he chooses to allow her presence or absence or even the threat of her presence to dictate his behavior. Presenting him with these choices will challenge him to allow life to grow him up and it will help you get your power back over your own home and over the shape of the relationship you have with your mother. Always refusing is not making a choice. This is what the immature do. Sometimes refusing, sometimes agreeing, is making a choice. This is what grownups do. Again, this is not meant as an insult. I am regularly tempted to be a child in my thoughts and attitudes and actions rather than a grown man.

4. When talking to your husband and mother always use the “YOUR mother-in-law” or “YOUR son-in-law.” This will help you get out of the middle and out of the room. That said, do not be the messenger between them. Pass no information back and forth between them – not even good news. You are not a carrier pigeon and nor should you assume the role. Do not let the other in on the state of affairs with the absent one. This will assist you to NOT gang up with your mother to get your husband “right.” Neither your husband nor your mother is the enemy here, the enemy is the confiscation of power by some (both your mother and your husband) while you stood by and watched. Granted, you did try to make a stand but it is understandable that his understandable tactic of intimidation worked. You get to decide if it has had its day.

You will know your husband and mother (and you) have all grown when not one of you is a “red rag to a bull” for anyone else and when no one of you is emotionally bullying anyone. Write again. Let me know what happens. Do not be surprised if you fail or do not carry it through. The threat of a loss of a marriage is a big one. I understand. I really do. By the way, please read any book you can find by Harriet Lerner.

Yours,

Rod Smith

A reader (not Rod) responds (while I have posted this, it does not mean I endorse its contents):……

“Your husband’s over-reaction to something your mom said speaks volumes. It is possible that the confrontation was the ‘last straw’. If you love and respect your husband, and if he is considered to be a fair and honest man, I would suggest you take serious note of his current attitude towards your mother. Encourage him to express his opinion of your mother, as well as his opinion of your relationship with her. Listen carefully. Try to hear what is on his heart, without arguing or being defensive. Perhaps he is not as unforgiving a person as you think, but is frustrated feeling his wife’s loyalties lie more with her mom than with him? It is very hard to truly forgive someone who is in denial and has poor boundaries. Take you eyes off your husband’s attitude and examine the relationship you have with your mother. Setting healthy boundaries for yourself is not an act of disloyalty to you mother. You obviously love and honor her, but don’t let this be at the expense of your relationship with your husband. Remember, he chose to marry you, not you-and-your-mom!”

April 21, 2009

Just when you thought there was hope….

by Rod Smith
I love Friedman. I hope you will too.

I love Friedman. I hope you will too.

I have reconstructed one of the late Rabbi Ed. Friedman’s parables which I first encountered as a footnote in his paper entitled “The Challenge of Change and the Spirit of Adventure.” (It’s essential reading, by the way):

A man was getting ready for heart bypass surgery when his organs called a (secret, of course) meeting. Lungs declared they would refuse to participate in the surgery saying the host had no business making them work harder after all they’d done for him for all these years.

Spleen agreed. Pancreas nudged in agreement. Actually Pancreas winked, but it is hard to tell with Pancreas.

Intestine mulled endlessly on the matter and felt (it was rather an emotional moment, actually) it should side, if he sided with anyone, with Spleen.

Intestine, who found it hard to have an opinion anyway, also did everything slowly.

The Kidney Twins, in unison and stony-faced, kidded a just little (they are not given to too much humor) that he had had the audacity to think they’d work any harder on his behalf, “Who does he think he is trying to get all well?” Their comment became a scoff.

Bowel, not given to small talk, churned the over the matter, repeatedly sighed a long conspiratorial, “Nooo. Nooo. Noooo!”

Liver, still seated, said he wasn’t about to change after all these years. Then, standing to address the meeting, said, “Who exactly is he to decide without due process anyway? New lease on life, a new Heart around here will mean new demands. Everyone’s been so worried about old Heart for all these years, no one gave a rip about us! We’ll show him who is boss! He’ll get all active – which means we’ll have to, too. No. No. No. What does he know about taking out the trash anyway? I do the REAL work around here!”

Round the table the organs voted and a decision was reached. “No! No to surgery for our ambitious, unreasonable, demanding, host.”

Just then Brain spoke up, “It’s none of your business. It is not your decision to make. Get back to work.”

(I highly recommend Friedman’s Fables and Failure of Nerve by the same author.)

April 6, 2009

To forgive or not to forgive, there is no question….

by Rod Smith

dsc_0642Infidelity is hard to forgive. Not forgiving it is harder. One is a severe punch. The other is a double whammy, its impact potentially outlasting the memory of the betrayal.

Unwillingness to forgive is often the only thing onto which a slighted spouse can hold, the only available ammunition to make a spouse pay. It’s easy to understand. Logical. It’s predictable. But, it ferries undesirable consequences.

Resentment might feel like a good and effective tool to hurt a partner for misdeeds, but it will make you most unattractive. Bitterness might be the most prevalent and obviousthorns emotion to feel, to use, but it will persistently eat you from the inside, leave you feeling even angrier, even more powerless over your life. Then, apart from punishing your spouse, they (resentment and bitterness) will punish you and contaminate all your relationships. In short, they have no boundaries and they are on a mission to deface all that is good and pure.

Who, from any arena of your life, wants to engage a bitter and resentful person in anything meaningful? His or her infidelity might make a spouse untrustworthy, but your resentment and bitterness will ultimately make you most unattractive!

A partner’s infidelity may rob you of trust, rob you of the sacredness of what you had in marriage, but given time, given time to hurt and to express feelings of appropriate anger, I suggest you relinquish your legitimate right to be angry, and forgive.

This is the high road. And your inner beauty will be strengthened, your light will once again begin to shine. And, your unfaithful spouse will no longer be in control of you or your future whether you remain married or not.

February 13, 2008

Bi-polar husband and his road-rage….

by Rod Smith

“My husband is bipolar and for almost all of our married life he has shown severe aggression whilst driving. The slightest irritation on the road would cause him to exhibit road rage. He would most often tailgate and show aggressive signs to other drivers. I have known him to get out of his vehicle to remonstrate with other motorists, without fear of his life or the safety of others, including my own or our young family. The slightest intake of breath on my part would make him angrier, and he would be even more reckless. I often felt as though a gun was being held to my head, except that the weapon was the motor vehicle. Other than not to travel with him for months on end, I felt trapped. I had thoughts of going to the Metro Police to report him, but feared repercussions. What steps I should have taken? Due to illness he no longer drives. Please Rod, what could I, or should I have done?”

This is a tough call. Bi-polar or not, no one has the right to endanger his family and others. Staying out of the car was a good thing to do! Readers, please, send your suggestions!